On January 7, 2026, President Trump issued an Executive Order titled "Prioritizing the Warfighter in Defense Contracting," directing the Secretary of War to identify underperforming defense contractors and impose new financial-discipline requirements on them. The EO is one of the most significant structural changes to Pentagon-prime relationships in years. Coverage from Latham & Watkins, Wiley, and Morgan Lewis.

Who's an "underperforming" contractor

Per the EO, DoW is directed to identify primes exhibiting any of:

  • Not investing their own capital into necessary production capacity
  • Not sufficiently prioritizing U.S. government contracts
  • Production speed insufficient for warfighting requirements

The threshold is deliberately flexible — DoW has discretion to designate primes as underperforming, subject to cure provisions.

What "underperforming" status triggers

  1. Stock buyback prohibition. Designated contractors cannot conduct stock buybacks until the performance issue is cured.
  2. Dividend issuance prohibition. Same restriction applies to dividends to shareholders.
  3. Executive compensation linkage. Future contracts must link executive compensation to performance metrics.
  4. Base salary caps. During periods of underperformance, contractors must cap executive base salaries.

The constitutional and practical questions

The EO raises real legal questions — federal contract conditions that restrict corporate capital-allocation decisions are novel. Expect litigation through 2026 testing:

  • Whether the government can condition contract award on corporate-governance terms
  • Whether "underperforming" designations are subject to administrative review
  • Whether shareholder-rights doctrines limit DoW's enforcement reach

Who's actually at risk

Primes with public-market exposure to recent DoD program delays — notably Sentinel, LGM-35A (ICBM), B-21 capacity, and Columbia-class submarine production — face the most obvious designation risk. Northrop Grumman's Sentinel restructure is a visible example; the company's B-21 capacity expansion is partly a pre-emptive response to EO-style pressure.

What this means for subcontractors

  • Primes under EO pressure will squeeze subcontractor margins harder in negotiations
  • Expect faster payment cycles as primes optimize cash management under buyback restrictions
  • Program-execution reliability becomes more valuable — primes want subs that deliver on time
  • Watch for prime reorganizations shifting work to non-DoD business units to manage designation risk

Sources